Megan L. Brackney participated in the panel entitled “Empire State Update: Recent Developments in New York State Taxes,” New York State Bar Association, Section of Taxation, Annual Meeting on January 28, 2020
The panelists discussed recent developments, including an update on New York’s draft corporate income tax regulations, newly issued administrative guidance, as well as some important decisions issued by the New York State Division of Tax Appeals and New York State judicial courts.
Usman Mohammad participated in the webinar entitled "U.S. Tax Reporting of Foreign Retirement Accounts and Other Foreign Trusts" hosted by Strafford on January 23, 2020
Usman Mohammad participated in the webinar entitled "U.S. Tax Reporting of Foreign Retirement Accounts and Other Foreign Trusts" hosted by Strafford on January 23, 2020.
By Michael Sardar
The CPA Journal
January 2020 Edition
Cryptocurrency is here to stay. As of November 17, 2019, the top five cryptocurrencies by market capitalization had a combined value of approximately $196 billion, and consumers can now use cryptocurrency in place of legal tender at numerous online and brick-and-mortar retailers. In 2014, the IRS issued Notice 2014-21, which generally provided that cryptocurrency would be treated as property for purposes of income tax and was, therefore, subject to the tax principles generally applicable to transactions involving the creation, sale, and acquisition of property.
Michael Sardar presented "The Updated IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice" at The Long Island University Tax Controversy Forum on January 16, 2020
Representatives of the IRS Local Taxpayer Advocate and the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance were available to help tax professionals with unresolved tax problems.
Caroline D. Ciraolo was interviewed for the "People in Tax" Podcast by ABA Tax Times on January 9, 2020
In part two of their interview, James Creech and Caroline Ciraolo discuss nationwide coordination of tax issues by the DOJ Tax Division, working in government, mentoring, and work-life balance.
For years, wrongfully incarcerated individuals who received compensation for their time behind bars were required to pay income taxes on the settlements they received from government organizations responsible for their wrongful incarceration. Congress changed the law in 2015 to exempt exonerees from paying income taxes on civil damages, restitution or other monetary awards received as compensation for their wrongful incarceration. Despite the passage of the Wrongful Conviction Tax Relief Act of 2015, many exonerated individuals remain unaware of their right to a refund of tax paid on their compensation, much less the applicable filing deadlines.
Christopher Ferguson presented the "Update on International Voluntary Disclosure Procedures" at the NYSSCPA’s International Tax Committee’s Annual Conference on January 30, 2020
An overview of the current options in place for those US taxpayers who have not complied with return filings and/or information disclosures, recent activities/focus by the IRS on enforcement, and traps for the unwary.
Problems Facing Taxpayers with Foreign Information Return Penalties and Recommendations for Improving the System (Part 2 of 3)
By Megan L. Brackney
January 7, 2020
For all of the foreign information return penalties, reasonable cause is a defense. See I.R.C. §§ 6038, 6038A(d)(3), 6038D(g), 6039F(c)(2), 6677(d); Treas. Reg. § 1.6038-2(k)(3)(ii). The IRS applies the same standards for reasonable cause for failure to file income tax returns under I.R.C. § 6651 to failure to file foreign information returns, i.e., the exercise of ordinary business care and prudence. See e.g., Chief Counsel Advisory 200748006.
Problems Facing Taxpayers with Foreign Information Return Penalties and Recommendations for Improving the System (Part 1 of 3)
By Megan L. Brackney
January 6, 2020
The IRS has been assessing more and more foreign information return penalties on taxpayers. It is difficult to find statistics on this point, as the IRS’s reports on tax penalties lump all “nonreturn” penalties into one category, which includes failure to file Forms 1099, 8300, and other information returns, along with foreign information return penalties. Even without the statistics, tax controversy practitioners know this to be true, as we have clients coming in with these assessments every day. Many of these penalties are being systematically assessed, meaning that a penalty is automatically issued whenever there is a late-filed form or a form is missing information, without regard to the individual circumstances of the taxpayer. In many cases, the penalties are wildly disproportionate to the taxpayer’s mistake, and serve no purpose other than to discourage taxpayers from voluntary compliance.